The theories about juveniles becoming delinquent

Regarding school-based interventions, among the least effective, and at times harmful, are those that aggregate deviant youth without adult supervision, such as in peer counseling and peer mediation Gottfredson et al.

Second, delinquent behavior is learned through interaction with others by way of communication. We know that most delinquents "age out" of deliquency, but we have not adequately explained why this happens Hirschi and Gottfredson Being labeled delinquent is thought, rather, to create special problems for the adolescents involved, often increasing the likelihood that this and related kinds of delinquent behavior will be repeated.

Edwin Sutherlandanticipated an emphasis of the symbolic-interactionist perspective with his early use of the concept of differential association. Here are some of the ones that are most important. The stable criminal subculture offers, as its name suggests, the most promising albeit still illegitimate prospects for upward economic mobility.

At the level of individuals, to have neither goals nor means is to be uncommitted and thus uncontrolled. Such an influence may be inferred, however, from the increase in crime that followed successful organization of gangs in Los Angeles Klein, The evidence for desistance in girls is not clear.

Although forensic psychologists and other educated individuals may understand the limitations of the adolescent brain in the context of making important legal decisions, the general public may not; it is important to emphasize these limitations and educate those in positions of power within the juvenile court system.

The theory is comprehensive, and only some of its most striking features can be outlined here. Power-control theory is another recent structural formulation Hagan that attempts to explain large and persistent gender differences in delinquency by taking power relations into account. To fully appreciate the development of these individual characteristics and their relations to delinquency, one needs to study the development of the individual in interaction with the environment.


It deals with reality, differentiates it from fantasy, and teaches children to delay gratification because acting on impulse will get them into trouble. Of the two components, Vold regarded judgments and definitions as more significant. Executive functions require generating and maintaining appropriate mental representations, monitoring the flow of information, and modifying problem-solving strategies in order to keep behavior directed toward the goal.

Summarizing their work on race, family structure, and delinquency in white and black families, Matsueda and Heimer Thus, both biology and environment influence behavior. The social behaviors that developmentalists study during childhood can be divided into two broad categories: Chambliss and Seidman conclude that a consequence of this principle is to bring into operation a "rule of law," whereby "discretion at every level.

Early hyperactivity and attention problems without concurrent aggression, however, appear not to be related to later aggressive behavior Loeber, ; Magnusson and Bergman, ; Nagin and Tremblay,although a few studies do report such relationships Gittelman et al.

One of the most prominent sociological theories is the social disorganization theory developed by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKaywho suggested that juvenile delinquency was caused by the neighborhood in which a person lived. The powerful influence of peers has probably not been adequately acknowledged in interventions designed to reduce delinquency and antisocial behavior.

juvenile delinquency, Theories of The topic of juvenile delinquency is a fertile area for construction of sociological theory. Three major sociological traditions, including structural functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory, contribute to the explanation of delinquency.

juvenile delinquency, theories of The topic of juvenile delinquency is a fertile area for construction of sociological theory. Three major sociological traditions, including structural functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory, contribute to the explanation of delinquency.

JUVENILE DELINQUENCY | THEORIES AND RISK FACTORS – PT. 5 It has been suggested that deviant peer groups do in fact influence non-delinquent individuals to become delinquent. According to the National Youth Survey of juveniles ages eleven to seventeen, a common pattern that was seen was a child switching from a non-delinquent peer group to.

Juvenile Delinquency

III. Major Theories of Juvenile Delinquency. Any idea about the causes, extent, and correlates of juvenile delinquency is essentially a theory, such as equating juvenile delinquency with sin and violating God’s law.

For more than two centuries, academic criminologists have developed a host of theories to explain juvenile delinquency. Juvenile delinquency is also used to refer to children who exhibit a persistent behavior of mischievousness or disobedience, so as to be considered out of parental control, becoming subject to legal action by the court system.

Modern studies on juvenile delinquency have found these factors influential enough in juvenile delinquency thus describing them as contemporary theories (HÅ n-su & HyÅ n-silp. 39). A good example is educational abilities of some victims of this kind of crimes.

The theories about juveniles becoming delinquent
Rated 5/5 based on 91 review
juvenile delinquency, Theories of